Name: Streptacidiphilus Kim et al. 2003

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Strept.a.ci.di’phi.lus. Gr. masc. adj. streptos, pliant, twisted; L. neut. adj. acidum, acid; Gr. masc. adj. philos, loving; N.L. masc. n. Streptacidiphilus, twisted, acid-loving

Gender: masculine (stem: Streptacidiphil-)

Type species: Streptacidiphilus albus Kim et al. 2003

Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS

16S rRNA gene: Analyse FASTA

Effective publication: Kim SB, Lonsdale J, Seong CN, Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus gen. nov., acidophilic actinomycetes with wall chemotype I and emendation of the family Streptomycetaceae (Waksman and Henrici (1943)AL) emend. Rainey et al. 1997. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2003; 83:107-116.

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Validation list no. 93. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1219-1220.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Phaeacidiphilus Madhaiyan et al. 2022	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Emendations:
  • Nouioui et al. 2019 Nouioui I, Klenk HP, Igual JM, Gulvik CA, Lasker BA, McQuiston JR. Streptacidiphilus bronchialis sp. nov., a ciprofloxacin-resistant bacterium from a human clinical specimen; reclassification of Streptomyces griseoplanus as Streptacidiphilus griseoplanus comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Streptacidiphilus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1047-1056. Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 69, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1847-1849.
    Notes:
    • ⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 2 new species in the genus.

• Notes:
  • 🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Strepacidiphilus"; "Streptacidiphi"; "Streptacidophilus"; "Streptoacidiphilus"; "Syreptacidiphilus".
  • 💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Golinska et al. (2016), Roh et al. (2018), Yu et al. (2021). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. The expression "monophyletic clade" is a pleonasm. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: JCM: 12; DSM: 12; NBRC: 8; KCTC: 7; NCIMB: 5; CGMCC: 4; ATCC: 2; NRRL: 2; VKM: 1; BCRC: 1.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 14
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 16
Total number of child taxa: 17

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Streptacidiphilus albus Kim et al. 2003	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus anmyonensis Cho et al. 2008	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus bronchialis Nouioui et al. 2019	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Streptacidiphilus carbonis Kim et al. 2003	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus durhamensis Golinska et al. 2014	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus fuscans Yu et al. 2021	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus griseoplanus (Backus et al. 1957) Nouioui et al. 2019	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Streptacidiphilus hamsterleyensis Golinska et al. 2014	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus jiangxiensis Huang et al. 2005	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus melanogenes Cho et al. 2008	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus monticola Song et al. 2018	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus neutrinimicus Kim et al. 2003	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus oryzae Wang et al. 2006	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus pinicola Roh et al. 2018	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus rugosus Cho et al. 2008	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus torunensis corrig. Golinska et al. 2018	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Streptacidiphilus toruniensis Golinska et al. 2018	inaccurate spelling	misspelling

Parent taxon: Streptomycetaceae Waksman and Henrici 1943 (Approved Lists 1980)

Assigned by: Kim SB, Lonsdale J, Seong CN, Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus gen. nov., acidophilic actinomycetes with wall chemotype I and emendation of the family Streptomycetaceae (Waksman and Henrici (1943)AL) emend. Rainey et al. 1997. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2003; 83:107-116.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/streptacidiphilusCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 516684