Species Novosphingobium rosa
Name: Novosphingobium rosa corrig. (Takeuchi et al. 1995) Takeuchi et al. 2001
Basonym: Sphingomonas rosa Takeuchi et al. 1995
Etymology: ro.sa. L. fem. n. rosa, the rose, the source of the organism (nominative in apposition)
Type strain: ATCC 51837; DSM 7285; HAMBI 2068; IAM 14222; IFO 15208; JCM 10276; LMG 17328; NBRC 15208; NCPPB 2661
See detailed strain information at
Conduct genome-based taxonomy at
16S rRNA gene:
AB680810
Analyse
FASTA
Valid publication:
Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417. 
IJSEM list:
Anonymous. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 51, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1621-1623.
Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status: correct name
-
Synonyms:
-
Name Kind Sphingomonas rosa Takeuchi et al. 1995 homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP Novosphingobium roseae (Takeuchi et al. 1995) Takeuchi et al. 2001 other spelling of name, inaccurate spelling
-
-
Notes:
- 😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1.
- 🎓 Name mentioned 4 times in PubMed until 2024-03-28.
-
🧍 The phylogenetic position of this species was determined in a genome-scale analysis by Hördt et al. (2020).
Publication:
Hordt A, Lopez MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468.
-
🧍 According to Rules 27(3) and 30, this name is not validly published because the effective publication makes no reference to the deposit of the type strain in any publicly accessible service collection, but deposits in at least two recognized culture collections in different countries are documented. According to the Judicial Opinion 81, Novosphingobium rosa corrig. (Takeuchi et al. 1995) Takeuchi et al. 2001 is to be considered to be validly published.
Publication:
Euzeby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301.
-
🧍 The original spelling of the specific epithet roseae (sic), has been corrected by the List Editor, IJSEM.
Publication:
Anonymous. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 51, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1621-1623.
Parent taxon: Novosphingobium Takeuchi et al. 2001
Assigned by:
Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417.
Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/novosphingobium-rosaLink copied to clipboard
Record number: 778917
This LPSN page was printed on 2024-04-28 05:15:45