Effective publication:
Kim SJ, Ahn JH, Weon HY, Hong SB, Seok SJ, Kim JS, Kwon SW. Chujaibacter soli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil. J Microbiol 2015; 53:592-597.
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 166. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3763-3767.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Risk group:
1
Notes:
🥇 Nomenclatural type of the genus Chujaibacter Kim et al. 2015.Publication:
Kim SJ, Ahn JH, Weon HY, Hong SB, Seok SJ, Kim JS, Kwon SW. Chujaibacter soli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil. J Microbiol 2015; 53:592-597.
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1.
🎓 Name mentioned 2 times in PubMed until 2024-03-28.