Name:Microbispora Nonomura and Ohara 1957 (Approved Lists 1980)
Category: Genus
Proposed as: gen. nov.
Etymology:Gr. masc. adj.mikros, small (may keep -o); L. adv.bis, twice; Gr. fem. n.spora, a seed and in biology a spore; N.L. fem. n.Microbispora, the small two-spored (organism)
Effective publication:
Nonomura H, Ohara Y. Distribution of Actinomycetes in the soil. II. Microbispora, a new genus of the Streptomycetaceae. Journal of Fermentation Technology 1957; 35:307-311.
IJSEM list:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Risk group:
1
Emendations:
Zhang et al. 1998
Zhang Z, Wang Y, Ruan J. Reclassification of Thermomonospora and Microtetraspora. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:411-422.
Anonymous. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 48, part 2 of the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:633-634. Notes:
⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.
Notes:
🧕 Goodfellow and Williams (1983) assigned this genus to the uncategorized "Maduromycetes" Goodfellow and Williams 1983.Publication:
Goodfellow M, Williams ST. Ecology of Actinomycetes. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1983; 37:189-216.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Aficrobispora"; "Jficrobispora"; "Mcrobspora"; "Micfobispofa"; "Micmbispora"; "Micobispora"; "Micrabispora"; "Micrebispora"; "Micrnbispora"; "Microbiospora"; "Microbispaora"; "Microbispoa"; "Microbispoba"; "Microbisporaa"; "Microbispqra"; "Microbispum"; "Microhispora"; "Miernbispora"; "Mierobispora"; "Mlcrobispora".
💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Muangham and Duangmal (2021), Zhao et al. (2020). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: NBRC: 20; DSM: 19; JCM: 16; IFO: 14; ATCC: 12; NRRL: 9; CGMCC: 7; VKM: 3; KCTC: 3; TBRC: 2.
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "ATCC PTA-5024: 1 Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1".
🧍 Pittman et al. (1991) suggested the abbreviation "MBSO" for this genus name but this does not appear to be of practical relevance any longer.Publication:
Pittman KF, Walczak CA, Lock CM. Codes and abbreviations for approved of effectively published names of genera of bacteria published from January 1980 to December 1990. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:571-579.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 13 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 27 Total number of child taxa: 29
Assigned by:
Ay H, Saygin H, Sahin N. Phylogenomic revision of the family Streptosporangiaceae, reclassification of Desertactinospora gelatinilytica as Spongiactinospora gelatinilytica comb. nov. and a taxonomic home for the genus Sinosporangium in the family Streptosporangiaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2562-2572.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/microbisporaLink copied to clipboard