Valid publication:
Schumann P, Weiss N, Stackebrandt E. Reclassification of Cellulomonas cellulans (Stackebrandt and Keddie 1986) as Cellulosimicrobium cellulans gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1007-1010.
IJSEM list:
Anonymous. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 51, part 3 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1231-1233.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Risk group:
1
Emendations:
Brown et al. 2006
Brown JM, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE, Daneshvar MI, Romero LJ, McNeil MM. Characterization of clinical isolates previously identified as Oerskovia turbata: proposal of Cellulosimicrobium funkei sp. nov. and emended description of the genus Cellulosimicrobium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:801-804.
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 56, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1461-1462. Notes:
⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
Yoon et al. 2007
Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Schumann P, Oh TK. Cellulosimicrobium terreum sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2493-2497.
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 57, part 11 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:313-314. Notes:
⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
Notes:
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Nocardia Trevisan 1889 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Metcalfe G, Brown ME. Nitrogen fixation by new species of Nocardia. J Gen Microbiol 1957; 17:567-572.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Brevibacterium Breed 1953 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Chatelain R, Second L. Taxonomie numérique de quelques Brevibacterium. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur (Paris) 1966; 111:630-644.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Brevibacterium Breed 1953 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Takayama K, Udagawa K, Abe S. Studies on the lytic enzyme produced by Brevibacterium. Part 1. Production of the lytic substance. Journal of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan 1960; 34:652-656.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Cellulomonas Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Stackebrandt E, Kandler O. Cellulomonas cartae sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1980; 30:186-188.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Cellulomonas Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Stackebrandt E, Keddie RM. Genus Cellulomonas Bergey et al. 1923, 154, emend. mut. char. Clark 1952, 50AL. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, first edition, vol. 2, The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1986, p. 1325-1329.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Cellulomonas Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Carta GR. Production of single cell protein material (U.S. Patent 3, 778, 349). Official Gazette of the United States Patent Office 1973; 778:349.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Oerskovia Prauser et al. 1970 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Lechevalier MP. Description of a new species, Oerskovia xanthinolytica, and emendation of Oerskovia Prauser et al. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1972; 22:260-264.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Cellulolomicrobium"; "Cellulomonasmicrobium"; "Cellulosimicro"; "Cellusimicrobium".
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.04092 (N = 6).
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 6; KCTC: 6; NBRC: 5; JCM: 4; ATCC: 4; LMG: 2; CCUG: 2; NRRL: 1; VKM: 1; MCC: 1.
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 2 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 2".
🧍 The Neo Latin noun Cellulosimicrobium is in the neuter gender not in the feminine gender as cited by Schumann et al. 2001 [all latin names which end in -um (nominative singular) are assigned neuter gender].Publication:
Euzeby JP. List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590-592.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 6 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 9 Total number of child taxa: 10
Assigned by:
Zhi XY, Li WJ, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:589-608.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/cellulosimicrobiumLink copied to clipboard