homotypic synonym, not validly published, basonym of name in Approved Lists
Emendations:
Hamada et al. 2010
Hamada M, Iino T, Iwami T, Harayama S, Tamura T, Suzuki K. Mobilicoccus pelagius gen. nov., sp. nov. and Piscicoccus intestinalis gen. nov., sp. nov., two new members of the family Dermatophilaceae, and reclassification of Dermatophilus chelonae (Masters et al. 1995) as Austwickia chelonae gen. nov., comb. nov. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2010; 56:427-436.
Euzeby JP. List of changes in taxonomic opinion no. 14. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1504-1505. Notes:
⊖ Emendation accompanied by the removal of 1 species from the genus.
🧍 In the paper by Hamada et al. 2010, the name Dermatophilus (van Saceghem 1915) Gordon 1964 is erroneously cited as Dermatophilus Gordon 1964.
Notes:
🥇 Nomenclatural type of the family Dermatophilaceae Austwick 1958 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Austwick PKC. Cutaneous Streptothricosis, Mycotic Dermatitis and Strawberry Foot Rot and the Genus Dermatophilus Van Saceghem. Veterinary Reviews & Annotations 1958; 4:33-48.
🥇 Nomenclatural type of the order Dermatophilales Salam et al. 2020.Publication:
Salam N, Jiao JY, Zhang XT, Li WJ. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331-1355.
🧕 Goodfellow and Williams (1983) assigned this genus to the uncategorized "Multilocular" Goodfellow and Williams 1983.Publication:
Goodfellow M, Williams ST. Ecology of actinomycetes. Annu Rev Microbiol 1983; 37:189-216.
🧕 Salam et al. (2020) assigned this genus to the order Dermatophilales Salam et al. 2020.Publication:
Salam N, Jiao JY, Zhang XT, Li WJ. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331-1355.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus "Dermatophilus" Van Saceghem 1915.Publication:
Van Saceghem R. Dermatose contagieuse (Impétigo contagieux). Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique 1915; 8:354-359.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Dematophilus"; "Demzatophilus"; "Dennatophilus"; "Dermacophilus"; "Dermamphilus"; "Dermatophi"; "Dermatophilis"; "Dermatophilosus"; "Dermatophylus"; "Dermatopilus"; "Dermatopnilus"; "Dermotophilus"; "Dermutophilus"; "Derrnatophilus".
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: ATCC: 2; DSM: 2; CCUG: 2; JCM: 2; NBRC: 1; NRRL: 1; NCTC: 1.
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 2 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 2".
🧍 Pittman et al. (1991) suggested the abbreviation "DMFL" for this genus name but this does not appear to be of practical relevance any longer.Publication:
Pittman KF, Walczak CA, Lock CM. Codes and abbreviations for approved of effectively published names of genera of bacteria published from January 1980 to December 1990. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:571-579.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 1 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 2 Total number of child taxa: 2
Assigned by:
Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997; 47:479-491.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/dermatophilusLink copied to clipboard